ATLANTA POLICE MAKES ARREST FOR EXERCISING FREEDOM OF SPEECH
On June 18, 2012 Ofc. Thomas assisted Mr. Hillman in enforcing the rule of two-people-per-table after concluding that the purpose for which he was summoned had nothing to do with law enforcement. Concluding that sitting in a chair and watching a game of chess did not constitute the violation of a state crime or city ordinance, he gave an unlawful order to shut down that area in the park.
The Ambassador Force habitually committed these acts although they had no lawful authority to do so. As a result of this deception, he/they habitually committed the offense of Impersonating an Officer under O.C.G.A. § 16-10-23. The law specifically states "A person who falsely holds himself out as a peace officer OR OTHER PUBLIC OFFICER OR EMPLOYEE with intent to mislead another into believing that he is actually such officer commits the offense of impersonating an officer..." The Georgia Court of Appeals stated in Loomis v. State, 78 Ga.App. 153, 51 S.E.2d 13 (1948) "Indictment accusing defendant of exercising or attempting to exercise without authority the functions of police officer was sufficient." These Ambassadors/Tour Guides repeatedly enforced rules created by a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization on public property under the color of law and in the ignorance of People.
During these illegal acts on this day, I was attempting to enlighten the other Citizens about the legal ramifications of the Ambassadors' actions and this officers conduct. Hearing the legal terminology I was using he began pressing me for my name. His only reason for this request was to interrupt this conversation; he was not investigating a crime. Understanding my rights to ignore this officer, I attempted to continue our conversation but he persisted on me reciting my name hoping I would give a false name thus granting him jurisdiction to make an arrest.
Under Florida v. Royer, 103 S.Ct. 1319, 460 U.S. 491, (1983), Justice White stated "Fact that police officer identifies himself as such, without more, does not convert encounter into seizure requiring some level of objective justification; however, person approached need not answer any questions put to him and may decline to answer questions at all and go on his way." In other words if an officer is not investigating a crime he/she has no authority to detain you or force you to answer his/her questions.
After I adamantly refused to comply with his unauthorized acts, Ofc. Thomas effectuated the arrest under the color of law, then after learning that the refusal to provide my name was not illegal, he charged me with a crime for conduct I did not commit. The case was dismissed three days later.
Ofc. Thomas thus committed the crimes of violation of his Oath of Office, False Imprisonment Under the Color of Law, Kidnapping, False Statements and Writings, Perjury and the federal crime of Deprivation of Rights Under the Color of Law pursuant to O.C.G.A. §§ 16-10-1, 16-5-42, 16-5-40(a), 16-10-20, 16-10-70(a), 18 U.S.C. § 242.
These crimes were reported to the Mayor of Atlanta, the City Councilman over this district and the president and vice-president of CAP, the corporation that founded the Atlanta Downtown Improvement District and the Ambassador Force. Neither Mr. Hillman nor Ofc. Thomas to date have not been fired, arrested and/or prosecuted. This negligence constitutes the condoning of this type of unethical behavior and their official endorsement of these acts.
THIS IS THE CLEAREST EXAMPLE OF THE EXERCISE OF TYRANNICAL LAW ON AMERICAN SOIL!!!